
Volume 11, Issue 2, Pages 320-346
This study presents the first literature review of dance/movement therapy (DMT) intervention studies conducted in Japan using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews. It aims to examine participants, outcome measures, intervention methods, effects, and study quality. Searches were conducted using Japanese databases, including Ichushi, CiNii, and Medical-Online, and English databases, including PubMed and Google Scholar, along with the Japanese Journal of Dance Therapy and the American Journal of Dance Therapy. Nine studies met the inclusion criteria. Findings revealed the following: levels of evidence: level 2, two studies; level 3, three studies; level 4, four studies; most common participants: individuals with intellectual disabilities (n=42, 24.8%); 13 (35.1%) of 37 outcome measures were standardized or objective; most used intervention: structured (n=5, 50.0%); frequent effects: improved balance and positive expression (both n=3, 13.0%).
本研究采用“系统评价和荟萃分析首选报告项目范围综述扩展版”(Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews,简称PRISMA-ScR),对日本开展的舞蹈/动作治疗(Dance/Movement Therapy,DMT)干预研究进行了首次文献综述。其目的在于对参与者、结局指标、干预方法、干预效果及研究质量进行分析。检索范围包括日文数据库 (Ichushi、CiNii、Medical-Online)、英文数据库 (PubMed、Google Scholar), 以及《日本舞蹈治疗杂志》和《美国舞蹈治疗杂志》。最终,共有九项研究符合纳入标准。研究发现如下:证据等级:2级(两项研究);3级(三项研究);4级(四项研究);最常见的参与者:智力障碍人士(n=42,占24.8%);在37项结局指标中,有13项(35.1%)采用标准化或客观测量工具;最常用的干预形式:结构化干预(n=5,占50.0%);常见效果:平衡能力改善与积极情绪表达(均为n=3,各占13.0%)。
dance/movement therapy, PRISMA-ScR, levels of evidence, intellectual disability.
舞蹈/动作治疗, PRISMA-ScR, 证据等级, 智力障碍.
Received 28 December 2025
Accepted 28 December 2025
This is an open access article.